<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Greater Than&#8217;s 2007 Year-End Recap (in Equations)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://isgreaterthan.net/2007/12/is-greater-thans-2007-year-end-recap-in-equations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://isgreaterthan.net/2007/12/is-greater-thans-2007-year-end-recap-in-equations/</link>
	<description>Literary-minded culture blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 06:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chanda</title>
		<link>http://isgreaterthan.net/2007/12/is-greater-thans-2007-year-end-recap-in-equations/comment-page-1/#comment-6398</link>
		<dc:creator>Chanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isgreaterthan.net/?p=506#comment-6398</guid>
		<description>As a postscript to my equation, this letter appeared in the 14 May 2009 issue of the London Review of Books:
Frank Kermode gets at what 21st-century Janeism is about: ‘It is said that among the television audience there were some who saw Darcy’s emergence from his pond – an event Austen omitted from her narrative – as the high point of the book’ (LRB, 30 April). And things have got worse since Andrew Davies’s 1995 serial. It is sad to think that there is a generation who, when they try to conjure Lizzy Bennet from the page, will have to fight back images of Keira Knightley pouting and pretending not to be beautiful in a mud-hemmed dress.
Janeism wasn’t always so aggressively female-friendly. Rudyard Kipling wrote the endearingly odd story ‘The Janeites’ (making the term famous) in 1924. His Janeites are not mob-capped elderly women of Bath, but soldiers and officers on the Western Front. Soldier Humberstall, invalided out of the army with a head wound, finds a way back to the front, to discover that he is only fit to be an assistant mess-waiter. He survives in the officers’ mess by being introduced into the ‘cult’ of Jane by the head mess-waiter – chalking ‘Reverend Collins’, ‘Lady Catherine de Bugg’ and ‘General Tilney’ on the battalion’s guns brings him 100 cigarettes instead of a ticking off. But being able to speak to superiors on equal terms is not Jane’s only godmotherly power. When the battery is destroyed in a barrage, Humberstall is the only survivor. After he jokingly calls the senior nurse Miss Bates – a plot twist Ian McEwan would envy – she makes room for him on the hospital train, saving his life: ‘You take it from me . . . there’s no one to touch Jane when you’re in a tight place. Gawd bless ’er, whoever she was.’ Endowed with such healing power, it is no wonder that Pride and Prejudice was prescribed to shellshocked soldiers, or that Churchill said it was Austen’s novels he turned to when things seemed bleak during the Second World War. So it has not always been girls sighing over Darcy’s wet shirt; Lizzy has also had her devoted boy fans. In a lecture to the women of Newnham College, Cambridge in 1911, A.C. Bradley needed no scriptwriter’s prompting to say of Elizabeth Bennet: ‘I was meant to fall in love with her, and I do.’
Kate Brayshay
Melksham, Wiltshire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a postscript to my equation, this letter appeared in the 14 May 2009 issue of the London Review of Books:<br />
Frank Kermode gets at what 21st-century Janeism is about: ‘It is said that among the television audience there were some who saw Darcy’s emergence from his pond – an event Austen omitted from her narrative – as the high point of the book’ (LRB, 30 April). And things have got worse since Andrew Davies’s 1995 serial. It is sad to think that there is a generation who, when they try to conjure Lizzy Bennet from the page, will have to fight back images of Keira Knightley pouting and pretending not to be beautiful in a mud-hemmed dress.<br />
Janeism wasn’t always so aggressively female-friendly. Rudyard Kipling wrote the endearingly odd story ‘The Janeites’ (making the term famous) in 1924. His Janeites are not mob-capped elderly women of Bath, but soldiers and officers on the Western Front. Soldier Humberstall, invalided out of the army with a head wound, finds a way back to the front, to discover that he is only fit to be an assistant mess-waiter. He survives in the officers’ mess by being introduced into the ‘cult’ of Jane by the head mess-waiter – chalking ‘Reverend Collins’, ‘Lady Catherine de Bugg’ and ‘General Tilney’ on the battalion’s guns brings him 100 cigarettes instead of a ticking off. But being able to speak to superiors on equal terms is not Jane’s only godmotherly power. When the battery is destroyed in a barrage, Humberstall is the only survivor. After he jokingly calls the senior nurse Miss Bates – a plot twist Ian McEwan would envy – she makes room for him on the hospital train, saving his life: ‘You take it from me . . . there’s no one to touch Jane when you’re in a tight place. Gawd bless ’er, whoever she was.’ Endowed with such healing power, it is no wonder that Pride and Prejudice was prescribed to shellshocked soldiers, or that Churchill said it was Austen’s novels he turned to when things seemed bleak during the Second World War. So it has not always been girls sighing over Darcy’s wet shirt; Lizzy has also had her devoted boy fans. In a lecture to the women of Newnham College, Cambridge in 1911, A.C. Bradley needed no scriptwriter’s prompting to say of Elizabeth Bennet: ‘I was meant to fall in love with her, and I do.’<br />
Kate Brayshay<br />
Melksham, Wiltshire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Greater Than &#187; Is Greater Than Year-End Equations: 2008 Edition</title>
		<link>http://isgreaterthan.net/2007/12/is-greater-thans-2007-year-end-recap-in-equations/comment-page-1/#comment-2516</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Greater Than &#187; Is Greater Than Year-End Equations: 2008 Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isgreaterthan.net/?p=506#comment-2516</guid>
		<description>[...] Join us as we break through the year’s rhetoric and double-speak as simply as we know how, and leave your own equations in the comments. For the historically minded, take a look at 2007’s edition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Join us as we break through the year’s rhetoric and double-speak as simply as we know how, and leave your own equations in the comments. For the historically minded, take a look at 2007’s edition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Pearson</title>
		<link>http://isgreaterthan.net/2007/12/is-greater-thans-2007-year-end-recap-in-equations/comment-page-1/#comment-2314</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isgreaterthan.net/?p=506#comment-2314</guid>
		<description>Is Greater Than &gt; a lot of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Greater Than &gt; a lot of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 5/3135 queries in 0.090 seconds using disk
Object Caching 729/732 objects using disk

Served from: isgreaterthan.net @ 2012-05-17 20:47:53 -->
