http://isgreaterthan.net/wp-content/themes/press

16 Mar 2009, Written by Monica Bologna-Huerta in politics,society

Shopping for Treatment


metastasizing_cancerWith all the money spent on cancer research in America, you would think that we would be winning the war on cancer. Yet similar to the War on Drugs or the War on Terror, with 564,800 Americans expected to die of cancer this year, the US again is clearly not winning. With all the advanced treatment facilities and drugs with unpronounceable names, cancer is still spreading like wildfire in America. The question that arises is: if these traditional treatments are not working, why aren’t cancer patients told about alternative cancer treatments known around the world in their oncologist’s office?

One alternative treatment that has been dubbed as quackery by the FDA is a fever therapy used in Germany that raises the body temperature and directs it towards the source of the cancer. These treatments are known as Hyperthermia, thermal therapy, thermotherapy, or fever therapy. On the Center for Hypothermia Hanover website they explain further:

Increasingly in the research of cancer cells, attention is being focused upon the escape mechanisms of these cells. Escape phenomenons occur when cells succeed in hiding themselves, in becoming invisible or when they send out messenger substances, which suppress the human immune system. Against these escape phenomenon’s, traditional medicine using radiation therapy and chemotherapy has proved rather ineffective, because the body’s degenerated cells are also able to defend themselves against radiation therapy and chemotherapy during treatment. Specifically active fever therapy, by inducing the fever phases, changes the surface of cancer cells, activates many messenger substances which stimulate the immune system to detect the cancer cells and to destroy them. There are also a number of highly potent medications, which change the information about messenger substances on the cancer cells to such an extent that they are exposed, detected and destroyed.

Our very own former president Ronald Reagan traveled to Germany to cure his cancer this way in 1985. When asked about whether or not he opted for German cancer treatments there wasn’t exactly screaming from the rooftops since the treatment was not allowed in the US.

Dr. Hans Neiper who was considered to be one of the best cancer doctors in the world treated Reagan along with other famous faces like: Princess Caroline of Monaco, Anthony Quinn, John Wayne, Nancy Sinatra, Red Buttons and Yul Brynner.  After Ronald Reagan’s treatment, he went on to live another 19 years and his death was not related to cancer.

In Andrew Scholberg’s book German Cancer Breakthrough , he writes that this treatment costs a tenth of what typical chemotherapy costs and is free of harmful side effects. In the book he gives a guide to all the treatment centers in Germany. Of course, this revolutionary treatment has been banned in the United States. That didn’t stop celebrities like Elizabeth Taylor, Suzanne Somers, or Cher from seeking out alternative treatments in Germany to cure their cancer. Why would the FDA deny Americans this type of treatment? If it is good enough for Ronny Reagan why isn’t it good enough for us?

american-cancer-society-centerThe answer may lie in the hands of an organization many see as immune to scrutiny, the American Cancer Society. Doctor Samuel Epstein the former head of a Congressional committee on cancer has been a long time critic of the American Cancer Society. Epstein claims that the ACS’ “longstanding conflicts of interest with a wide range of industries, coupled with a systematic discrediting of evidence of avoidable causes of cancer preclude many powerful life-saving initiatives.”

The American Cancer Societies 22-member board was created in 1990 to gather corporate contributors. Natural news writes that board members include Gordon Binder, who is the CEO of Amgen, a biotechnology company that sells chemotherapy products. Another board member, David R. Bethune, is president of Lederle Laboratories, a multinational pharmaceutical company and a division of American Cyanamid Company.

With these board members representing their own financial interests, chances are that alternative medicines that cut costs and increase cures are going to look pretty unappetizing. Although unable to find an exact number of how much money chemotherapy generates per year, the word billions is well within the realm of possibility.

In a 2005 debate, Dr. Michael Thun of the American Cancer Society did not exactly deny corporate interests: “The American Cancer Society views relationships with corporations as a source of revenue for cancer prevention. That can be construed as an inherent conflict of interest, or it can be construed as a pragmatic way to get funding to support cancer control.”

It is no wonder that barely any funding is spent on the prevention of cancer since all the money to be made lies in the treatment of cancer. The problem is that the go-to treatment, chemotherapy, is toxic on the human body. According to the Stanford Cancer Center, some of the side effects of Chemotherapy drugs for various types of cancers include: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hair loss, decrease in blood cell counts, allergic reaction, rashes, hearing loss, kidney damage, bladder damage, fertility impairment, lung or heart damage, secondary malignancies, mouth ulcers, weakness, loss of appetite, and loss of reflexes. Those are just a few of the symptoms they list but anyone who has known a person who has endured Chemo can tell you that.  Chemotherapy can be effective for a small number of cancers, like leukemia. Yet in relation to most cancer cases, why would we destroy our entire house if we had a few roaches inside it knowing our house may not be able to be rebuilt? Chemotherapy, instead of killing just the cancer cells, kills healthy cells as well and many times kill the cancer patient. Many doctors have tried to tell the public the truth about chemotherapy, the truth being that (except for a few types of cancers) it does more harm to the body than good. One of these doctors is Dr. Ralph Moss who has said: “If cancer specialists were to admit publicly that chemotherapy is of limited usefulness and is often dangerous, the public might demand a radical change in direction-possibly toward unorthodox and nontoxic methods, and toward cancer prevention.”

If interested in the alternative German Cancer treatments, the Center for Hypothermia Hanover is one centers that use the same method as Dr. Neiper. Not all Cancer centers in Germany have these alternative treatments so it is important to find out before making the trek.

What does FDA approved mean anymore in America and has it really meant a whole lot in the past? The fact is that The American Cancer Society, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Cancer Institute, and the American Medical Association as well as all the drug companies out there generate enormous profits from our misguided wallets. Our health care is being run by businessmen and not by doctors. At this point it is up to us to be advocates of our own health and first take the steps toward healthy living to avoid dealing with the business of cancer.


Monica Bologna-Huerta , a native of Cincinnati Ohio, is finishing up her BA in Fiction Writing at Columbia College Chicago. After graduation she plans to travel the world teaching English and perfect her (now intermediate level) Spanish.

View all articles by Monica Bologna-Huerta.



This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

5 Comments

March 16, 2009 5:46 pm

Matthew

I hate to be the bearer of good news but to suggest that “cancer is still spreading like wildfire” would be ignoring the facts. In fact, as the CDC reported last November, “for the first time since the report was first issued in 1998, both incidence and death rates for all cancers combined are decreasing for both men and women” And the numbers have been decreasing every year for the last 10 years since the report started. There’s a lot more info in the press release and even more in the actual report- http://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2008/r081202.htm
I appreciate the sentiment of the article, but don’t falsely set it up so it’s easy to knock down, that’s cheap.

March 16, 2009 8:53 pm

Monica

Speaking of cheap… It is interesting that at the end of the report on the CDC website you sited it says:

“The study was conducted by scientists at the ACS, CDC, NCI, which is part of the National Institutes of Health, and the NAACCR.”

Sorry but that is like Fox News reporting that war has decreased.

If you find out about the things they have done you’ll see why. For example if you read about the CDC covering up evidence of vaccines being linked to autism in children, it is infuriating and very scary. When the effects of thimerosal (a mercury based preservative in vaccines) proved to cause autism in children, the CDC and other major health organizations worked hard at covering their asses with some help from Bill Frist. The CDC then paid the Institute of Medicine to conduct another study that concealed/cancelled out the connection to thimerosal and autism. Even though plenty of studies dating back to the 1930’s already proved the connection. The head of the chemistry dept from the University of Kentucky said you couldn’t even conduct a study that shows thimerosal is safe yet the study claimed that there was no connection and that there should be no more investigations. The whole article is really terrifying when you think of how we are supposed to trust our medical establishments. In reality they are responsible for a lot of death.

Read Robert Kennedy Jr’s Deadly Immunity here: http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/06/16/thimerosal/index.html

These organizations that conducted this report you sited are the very organizations that many doctors (who aren’t on the payroll) have stepped forward to criticize as well as the pharmaceutical companies who back them. So to some people that report may be solid gold, but to others, it is up for a lot of questioning. Another important factor to consider is that organizations like ACS and others under the NAACCR do not account for the deaths due to the EFFECTS of chemotherapy. They classify many of these deaths under “malnutrition” which is one of the side effects of chemo. A lot of the deaths due to side effects of chemotherapy are not classified under cancer; they are classified under whatever side effect the person was unfortunate enough to die from.

If you believe that these organizations put out the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth then that’s your call but I for one don’t take information from lobbying-pharma-companies at face value.

If you or anyone else is interested, a great book that goes in depth about the major medical orgs in the US is: The China Study by Dr. T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell II.

March 18, 2009 7:05 am

Brian

Way to go Monica !!!!!!!!

March 22, 2009 5:15 pm

Doris

I feel patients should have chances to try any treatments effective to their cancer since the worst result is death. If thermal therapy, unlike chemotherapy, doesn’t have any side effects as described in the book, German Cancer Breakthrough, why not give it a try? Americans are so innocent if the ban of this alternative treatment is due to the conflicts of interest among those biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. I wonder if any of those board members has cancer, which way they would choose to cure their cancer.

August 9, 2009 9:15 am

Gerry

Cancer, which 50 plus years ago was experienced usually by the elderly, is now the leading cause of death in children….

Posting your comment...

Leave A Comment


Subscribe to this comment via Email